Jan 11, 2016 · In the context of making ethical decisions, knowing what actions are morally defensible is referred to as: (Points : 1) moral awareness. moral judgment. moral character. moral certainty. moral ability.
May 09, 2016 · Moral awareness means knowing what actions are morally defensible. FALSE Making ethical decisions takes moral awareness (realizing the issue has ethical implications), moral judgment (knowing what actions are morally defensible), and moral character (the strength and persistence to act in accordance with your ethics despite the challenges).
Ethical decision making requires: a. moral awareness (realizing the issue has ethical implications) b. moral judgment (knowing what actions are morally defensible) c. moral character (having the strength and persistence to act in accordance with your ethics despite the challenges.)
Dec 17, 2019 · They are moral awareness—realizing the issue has ethical implications; moral judgment—knowing what actions are morally defensible; moral character—the strength and persistence to act in accordance with your ethics despite the challenges In an organization, the processes by which decisions are evaluated and made on the basis of right and wrong …
Awareness. Making ethical decisions takes moral awareness (realizing the issue has ethical implications), moral judgment (knowing what actions are morally defensible), and moral character (the strength and persistence to act in accordance with your ethics despite the challenges).
Egoism. According to egoism, acceptable behavior is that which maximizes benefits for the individual. According to its proponents, if everyone follows this system, the well-being of society as a whole should increase.
Advocates of corporate social responsibility argue that organizations have a wider range of responsibilities that extend beyond the production of goods and services at a profit. As members of society, organizations should actively and responsibly participate in the community and in the larger environment.
Universalism. Universalism states that all people should uphold certain values, such as honesty, that society needs to function. Universal values are principles so fundamental to human existence that they are important in all societies, such as rules against murder, deceit, torture, and oppression.
•#N#Scholars have identified three distinct constructs of moral recognition: moral awareness, moral sensitivity and moral attentive ness.#N#•#N#Moral recognition is shaped by a wide range of biological, psychological and socio-cultural antecedents.#N#•#N#Moral recognition is associated with moral behavior and many other positive outcomes.
Social-cultural factors refer to those factors that constitute the context of the decision, and may be easily discernable and proximate (e.g., office decor ) or more understated and embedded (e.g., national context). Most notably, Jones [ 26] proposed that characteristics of the issue that contribute to the issue's moral intensity (e.g., magnitude of consequences, temporal immediacy, proximity) will affect moral recognition. Numerous studies have established the validity of this argument [ 1•, 14, 27, 28 ].
Psychological factors refer to those elements associated with how the individual perceives and processes information. In recent research, numerous psychological factors have been associated with moral awareness, many of which are not typically associated with the moral domain. For example, Bryant [ 19] found that entrepreneurs with stronger self-regulatory characteristics were more morally aware than their counterparts. Specifically, entrepreneurs who chronically held a focus on promotion-oriented or prevention-oriented goals (e.g., an interest in achieving a win or avoiding a loss), or entrepreneurs that were highly self-efficacious, were more morally aware than others. Gino and Bazerman [ 20] argued that implicit biases based on a gradual shift in behavior, that is, the slippery slope effect, reduced moral awareness. In four laboratory experiments they discovered that to the extent that individuals engaged in slightly immoral conduct, they were less morally aware of more egregious behaviors. Ruedy and Schweitzer [ 21] demonstrated a relationship between mindfulness, ‘a state of being attentive to and aware of what is taking place in the present’ [ 22 ], and moral behavior, which they theorized was mediated by moral awareness. Finally, Swenson-Lepper [ 23] utilized cognitive mapping to demonstrate that the patterns of concept associations that individuals form to understand their environment shape their moral awareness.