making a judgment on the basis of one or even a few samples is what type of fallacy? course hero

What is a fallacy fallacy?

Dec 11, 2018 · Question 3 3.5 out of 3.5 points Making a judgment on the basis of one or even a few samples is what type of fallacy? Selected Answer: Hasty Conclusion Selected Answer : …

Do logical fallacies undermine the validity of an argument?

Feb 23, 2020 · Question 6 3.5 out of 3.5 points Making a judgment on the basis of one or even a few samples is what type of fallacy? Selected Answer: Hasty Conclusion Selected Answer : …

What are the 15 common logical fallacies?

Jan 30, 2019 · Course Title RLGN 105; Type. Test Prep. Uploaded By hechotiner2. Pages 8 Ratings 98% ... Question 25 3 out of 3 points Making a judgment on the basis of one or even a few samples is what type of fallacy? ... Hebrew-Bible with Course Hero's FREE study guides and infographics! Study Guide. Study Guide. Old Testament | Hebrew-Bible ...

Do all logical fallacies sound the same?

Aug 24, 2018 · Course Title RLGN 104; Type. Test Prep. Uploaded By lindsey911henderson; Pages 4 Ratings 96% ... Making a judgment on the basis of one or even a few samples is what type of fallacy? i. ... Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. ...

When someone comes to a conclusion based on weak evidence, they are using the hasty generalization fallacy

Those using this argument fail to use well-researched and proven evidence to make their claims. Instead, they may pick and choose a few key details that happen to fit their position. While one piece of evidence can prove their argument, they fail to address counterarguments or other types of evidence that may invalidate their claims.

What is the drawback of the fallacy?

The main drawback of this kind of fallacy is that it makes the other party look unreasonable.

What is the fallacy of denying counterexamples?

This fallacy is when one person protects their generalized claim by denying counterexamples. They do this by changing the initial terms of their generalization to invalidate any counterexamples that might exist.

Why is the straw man fallacy called the straw man fallacy?

The straw man fallacy. The straw man fallacy gets its name because it is an argument that is thin and has no substance. It occurs when your opponent argues against a position you aren't even trying to present. With this tactic, they tend to misrepresent or alter the points you are making.

What is anecdotal evidence fallacy?

Rather than using hard facts and data, people using the anecdotal evidence fallacy base their arguments on their own experiences. These kinds of arguments focus on emotions over logic. They do not recognize that one person's experience may not provide sufficient evidence to make a generalized claim.

Why is it important to understand logical fallacies?

Understanding common logical fallacies is an important part of judging other's arguments and crafting your own. When you use logic that is consistent and makes sense, your employer and colleagues are more likely to take your arguments seriously.

What happens when you misuse authority?

When people misuse authority, this kind of fallacy can occur. Those who use this fallacy often put too much confidence into one person's opinions or thoughts. This is especially evident when this person is arguing something outside of their expertise. Although asking an authority figure to support your argument can be a good debate tactic, it can also become misleading if you do it incorrectly. While it can be a feature of your debate, you should also use researched-based facts and figures to prove your point.

What are logical fallacies?

Logical fallacies -- those logical gaps that invalidate arguments -- aren't always easy to spot. While some come in the form of loud, glaring inconsistencies, others can easily fly under the radar, sneaking into everyday meetings and conversations undetected. Having an understanding of these basic logical fallacies can help you more confidently ...

What is the fallacy used to protect assertions that rely on universal generalizations?

Often used to protect assertions that rely on universal generalizations (like "all Marketers love pie") this fallacy inaccurately deflects counterexamples to a claim by changing the positioning or conditions of the original claim to exclude the counterexample.

What is the fallacy of anecdotal evidence?

In place of logical evidence, this fallacy substitutes examples from someone's personal experience. Arguments that rely heavily on anecdotal evidence tend to overlook the fact that one (possibly isolated) example can't stand alone as definitive proof of a greater premise.

What is the common fallacy of two mutually exclusive outcomes?

Instead of acknowledging that most (if not all) issues can be thought of on a spectrum of possibilities and stances, the false dilemma fallacy asserts that there are only two mutually exclusive outcomes.

What is slothful induction?

Slothful induction is the exact inverse of the hasty generalization fallacy above. This fallacy occurs when sufficient logical evidence strongly indicates a particular conclusion is true, but someone fails to acknowledge it, instead attributing the outcome to coincidence or something unrelated entirely.

What is the tu quoque fallacy?

The tu quoque fallacy (Latin for "you also") is an invalid attempt to discredit an opponent by answering criticism with criticism -- but never actually presenting a counterargument to the original disputed claim.

What is the fallacy of setting up a straw man?

This fallacy occurs when your opponent over-simplifies or misrepresents your argument (i.e., setting up a "straw man") to make it easier to attack or refute. Instead of fully addressing your actual argument, speakers relying on this fallacy present a superficially similar -- but ultimately not equal -- version of your real stance, helping them create the illusion of easily defeating you.

What is a fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt?

A fallacy in which a claim is based on evidence or support that is in doubt. A fallacy in which the speaker presents two extreme options as the only possibly choices. A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence. The potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument.

What is a fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented

a fallacy by which a key word or phrase in an argument is used with more than one meaning. slippery slope. A fallacy that assumes that taking a first step will lead to subsequent steps that cannot be prevented. dicto simpliciter.

What is a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior

A type of ad hominem argument in which a person turns a charge back on the accuser. complex question. a fallacy in which the answer to a given question presupposes a prior answer to a prior question. equivocation. a fallacy by which a key word or phrase in an argument is used with more than one meaning. slippery slope.

What does the fallacy "after which therefore because of which" mean?

This fallacy is Latin for "after which therefore because of which," meaning that it is incorrect to always claim that something is a cause just because it happened earlier. One may loosely summarize this fallacy by saying that correlation does not imply causation. straw man.

What is hasty generalization?

hasty generalization. A fallacy in which a faulty conclusion is reached because of inadequate evidence. logical fallacy. The potential vulnerabilities or weaknesses in an argument. They often arise from a failure to make a logical connection between the claim and the evidence used to support it. post hoc ergo propter hoc. ...