According to USA Today, a whopping 10 people were ultimately dismissed from the jury box during the course of the trial, leaving only two alternates remaining by the end.
Full Answer
· The Jury Was Always Changing. One of the key stressors in the O.J. Simpson trial was the looming threat of a mistrial due to the court constantly hemorrhaging jurors. The case was appointed the ...
· So, how many jurors were dismissed from the O.J. Simpson trial? "Over the course of the trial, 10 jurors in all were dismissed for misconduct, personal conflicts or illness," the Chicago Tribune ...
· How many jurors were dismissed during the course of O J Simpsons double murder trial - trivia question /questions answer / answers. Ask FunTrivia. ... How many jurors were dismissed during the course of O. J. Simpson's double murder trial? Question #15676. Asked by Maggie. Last updated Jan 03 2017.
· Another juror in O.J. Simpson’s double murder trial was dismissed Thursday after Judge Lance A. Ito abruptly recessed testimony and summoned prosecution and defense attorneys to his chambers for ...
Orenthal James Simpson or as most people know him as OJ Simpson. He rose to fame through playing for the San Francisco 49ners football team. He was also known for his career as sports commentator. He is most known for the murder trial of his wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman.
He was first married to Marguerite L. Whitley in June 24, 1967. In that relationship he had three children, which included Aaren Lashone Simpson who drowned in the family’s pool before her second birthday. That same year they divorced and in 1985 married Nicole Brown.
1. The 9-1-1 call and the history of Simpson's violence directed at Nicole Brown. 2. Hair evidence: (1) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on cap at Bundy residence, (2) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on Ron Goldman's shirt.
10:51 or 10:52 Kato Kaelin hears three thumps on the wall outside his room.
From an original jury pool of 40 percent white, 28 percent black, 17 percent Hispanic, and 15 percent Asian, the final jury for the trial had ten women and two men, of whom nine were black, two white and one Hispanic. The jury was sequestered for 265 days, the most in American history.
The defense team's reasonable doubt theory was summarized as "compromised, contaminated, corrupted" in opening statements. They argued that the DNA evidence against Simpson was "compromised" by the mishandling of criminalists Dennis Fung and Andrea Mazzola during the collection phase of evidence gathering, and that 100% of the "real killer (s)" DNA had vanished from the evidence samples. The evidence was then "contaminated" in the LAPD crime lab by criminalist Collin Yamauchi, and Simpson's DNA from his reference vial was transferred to all but three exhibits. The remaining three exhibits were planted by the police and thus "corrupted" by police fraud. The defense also questioned the timeline, claiming the murders happened around 11:00pm that night.
Bailey suggested that he then planted the glove in order to frame Simpson, with the motive either being racism or a desire to become the hero in a high-profile case. Scheck also suggested that Fuhrman broke into Simpson's Bronco and used the glove like a paint brush to plant blood onto and inside the Bronco.
In a walk around the premises to inspect what may have caused the thumps, Fuhrman discovered a blood-stained right-hand glove, which was determined to be the mate of the left-hand glo ve found next to the body of Goldman. This evidence was determined to be probable cause to issue an arrest warrant for Simpson.
The defense alleged that Simpson's blood on the back gate at the Bundy crime scene was planted by the police. The blood on the back gate was collected on July 3, 1995, rather than June 13, the day after the murders. The volume of DNA on that blood was significantly higher than the other blood evidence collected on June 13. The volume of DNA was so high that the defense conceded that it could not be explained by contamination in the lab, yet noted that it was unusual for that blood to have more DNA on it than the other samples collected at the crime scene, especially since it had been left exposed to the elements for several weeks and after the crime scene had supposedly been washed over. On March 20, 1995, Vannatter testified that he instructed Fung to collect the blood on the gate on June 13 and Fung admitted he had not done so. The defense suggested the reason why Fung did not collect the blood is because it was not there that day; Scheck showed a blown-up photograph taken of the back gate on June 13 and he admitted he could not see it in the photograph.
Fears grew that race riots, similar to the riots in 1992, would erupt across Los Angeles and the rest of the country if Simpson were convicted of the murders. As a result, all Los Angeles police officers were put on 12-hour shifts. The police arranged for more than 100 police officers on horseback to surround the Los Angeles County courthouse on the day the verdict was announced, in case of rioting by the crowd. President Bill Clinton was briefed on security measures if rioting were to occur nationwide.
The two lead prosecutors were Deputy District Attorneys Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden. Clark was designated as the lead prosecutor and Darden became Clark's co-counsel. Prosecutors Hank Goldberg and William Hodgman, who have successfully prosecuted high-profile cases in the past, assisted Clark and Darden. Two prosecutors who were DNA experts, Rockne Harmon and George "Woody" Clarke, were brought in to present the DNA evidence in the case and were assisted by Prosecutor Lisa Kahn.
The racial composition of the jury was strongly influenced by the decision of the prosecution to file the Simpson case in downtown Los Angeles rather than--as is usually the case-- in the judicial district where the crime occurred-- in this case, Santa Monica. Had the case be filed in Santa Monica, the Simpson jury would have been mostly white instead of, as was the case, mostly African-American. With poll data showing that most whites believed Simpson to be guilty and most blacks believing him to be not guilty, the decision to file the case in Santa Monica may have been the biggest mistake the prosecution made. Vincent Bugliosi, the celebrated prosecutor in the Charles Manson case, said the mistake "dwarfed anything the defense did."
One juror was excluded for watching cartoons with her children, another for waking up to a clock radio. On October 18, Faye Resnick's book on Nicole Simpson's relationship with O. J. hit the bookstores, causing Ito to order a temporary halt to jury selection and to tell potential jurors "I forgot to tell you to stay out of bookstores.".
Some other facts about the final jury: (1) None regularly read a newspaper, but eight regularly watch tabloid TV shows, (2) five thought it was sometimes appropriate to use force on a family member, (3) all were Democrats, (4) five reported that they or another family member had had a negative experience with the police, ...
Vincent Bugliosi, the celebrated prosecutor in the Charles Manson case, said the mistake "dwarfed anything the defense did.". Jury selection got underway on September 24, 1994 in Judge Ito's courtroom. Present that day were 250 potential members of the jury and the judge, Simpson, and lawyers for both sides. Participating for the defense in the ...
The prosecution eliminated eight African American potential jurors and two whites from the 39 people who appeared in court today. The defense excused two African Americans, five whites, one Hispanic and two Native Americans. Each side accused the other of racial bias, appealing to Ito to refuse certain challenges.
After Ito quickly swore them in, one juror, a Hispanic 38-year-old letter carrier, covered her face and then blinked her eyes rapidly as if in shock. Simpson, 47, faces first-degree murder charges in the June 12 slashing deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald L. Goldman.
Along with being sequestered for eight and a half months, 10 jurors were dismissed from the case by Judge Lance Ito. The final group of 12 jurors who decided on the Simpson criminal case verdict was comprised ...
One of the only two men on the jury was David A. Aldana. While he was hesitant to give his exact reason for why he voted not guilty, Aldana did give an interview to The New York Times (that The Baltimore Sun also reported) where he said, "Things just didn't add up," referring to the evidence in the trial.
Rosborough told Winfrey not only that she had "doubts [about Fuhrman] from the beginning," but also that she didn't think the evidence was there. "If [Simpson] had committed such a bloody crime, there should have been more blood in that Bronco.". she said, referencing Simpson's car.
Cryer also will be known for being the juror who, when the jury was leaving the courtroom after the verdict, raised his fist in the air as an indication of solidarity with Simpson. "It was like a 'right on' to you, Mr. Simpson," Cryer told the LA Times. "Get on with your life. Get your kids. Be happy.
After the verdict was read on Oct. 3, 1995, some jurors gave media interviews that explain how they came to their decision. As the American Crime Story episode "A Jury in Jail" highlighted, life was not peachy for the jurors of the Trial of the Century.
One of the only two men on the jury was David A. Aldana. While he was hesitant to give his exact reason for why he voted not guilty, Aldana did give an interview to The New York Times (that The Baltimore Sun also reported) where he said, "Things just didn't add up," referring to the evidence in the trial. In this interview six days after the verdict, he confirmed that he was completely confident with his decision saying, "I can sleep at night, no problem."
He also echoed Moran's sentiment that the domestic violence between Simpson and Brown Simpson did not affect the verdict because the prosecution only presented a 1989 incident when Brown Simpson was hospitalized, for which Simpson "pleaded no contest to a charge of spousal abuse," according to the New York Times.