Nov 11, 2019 · Baby Boomers, the generation of people born between 1944 and 1964, are expected to transfer $30 trillion in wealth to younger generations over the next many years. …
Feb 09, 2012 · History shows us that when wealth is forcibly redistributed, even with the best of intentions, those people who started out with the wealth tend to be exactly the same sort of …
Sep 04, 2016 · Wealth and Income Inequality in Athens: The Birth of Athenian Democracy. We can trace wealth and income inequality, and the role of factions in this, to one of the oldest …
According to Institute for Policy Studies analysis of Forbes data, the combined wealth of all U.S. billionaires increased by $2.071 trillion (70.3 percent) between March 18, 2020 and Ocobter 15, …
Baby Boomers, the generation of people born between 1944 and 1964, are expected to transfer $30 trillion in wealth to younger generations over the next many years.
According to a 2018 study by TIAA Institute, only 11% of Millennials displayed a “relatively high” level of financial literacy, with another 28% of the group conveying a “very low” literacy rate in finances.
As the baby boomer name suggests, this generation represent ed a sudden growth in population post World War II. After decades of prosperity and economic growth, this generation amassed significant financial wealth and control roughly 70% of all disposable income, according to a 2015 report by US News & World Report.
Income is a fairly common indicator of financial well-being. Let’s examine how income inequality has changed from 1989 to 2016, the earliest and latest years for which Survey of Consumer Finances data are available.
Ana Hernández Kent is the senior researcher for the Institute for Economic Equity at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Her research interests include economic disparities and opportunity, class and racial biases, and the relationship between psychological factors and the household balance sheet. Read more about Ana’s research.
The term “gospel of wealth” refers to the 1889 article of the same name by Scottish immigrant Andrew Carnegie. Carnegie became the second-richest man in American history (after John D. Rockefeller) by dominating the growing steel industry. In “The Gospel of Wealth,” Carnegie argued that extremely wealthy Americans like himself had ...
There are three main concepts that help contextualize Andrew Carnegie’s work: the Gilded Age, industrialization, and Social Darwinism.
The Gilded Age was an era of rapid economic growth. At this time, wealthy “captains of industry” and “robber barons” manipulated the growing steel, railroad, and gold markets and became astronomically rich.
In the Gospel of Wealth, Carnegie describes the wealthy as being especially skilled, intelligent, and prepared with the tools needed to responsibly and efficiently distribute money. This idea implies that poverty is a kind of character flaw of those Americans who are less hardworking.
This societal theory from the 1870’s argues that the economically “strong” (in other words, the very wealthy) will rise to positions of power while the “weak” (the poor) will occupy the lowest, least powerful positions in society.
The Second Industrial Revolution, beginning between 1840 and 1860 and continuing until World War I, created a rapidly growing set of industries in America including steel, rail, and coal mining. The growth of factories changed the dynamic of the American work force and created a need for the rise of labor unions and other forms of organized labor. For the first time, the need for skilled labor decreased as the popularity of unskilled factory work soared. However, jobs were created for both skilled and unskilled workers, and the wages of both groups grew. A new middle class began to form, but nevertheless the gap between the rich and poor was enormous.
A large wealth gap breeds injustice and rebellion in the lowest economic classes, especially when poverty affects education and basic human comforts, and especially when people aren’t free to live with dignity in poverty. For instance, hyperinflation makes poverty unbearable, as does food shortage.
In general, social inequality, political inequality and economic inequality corrupt demo cracies as they create a negative feedback loop which funnels economic and political power away from the lower classes over time.
Discretionary money, both income and wealth, EQUALS power. Having spare cash to spend allows one to spend it on choosing how they want their world to become. They can choose their own candidates for office. It allows them to spend it on their choices of products rather than just what they can afford.
Long before taking Athens, and much of the rest of the world, Rome had transitioned from a Kingship to a Republic (which in Rome’s case was a type of Democracy). After taking Athens, they had the whole of Greek tradition to pull from and had what one could argue is the Golden Age of their Roman Republic (not to be confused with the Golden Age of the Empire under Augustus).
Although we detail the effects of Communism and Fascism here, we can briefly say Lenin and Stalin and Hitler came to power in socialist revolutions where the masses had become economically oppressed due to the actions of the aristocrats.
Over the past three decades, America’s most affluent families have added to their net worth, while those on the bottom have dipped into “negative wealth,” meaning the value of their debts exceeds the value of their assets , according to National Bureau of Economic Research data.
Inequality is skyrocketing even within the Forbes 400 list of America’s richest. As of 2019, the net worth of the richest member of this group was 21 times larger than the net worth of the richest member in 1982 (in today’s dollars).
By contrast, their share of the nation’s wealth nearly quadrupled during that period, rising from 2.5 percent to 9.6 percent.
Money–in some way, shape or form–has been part of human history for at least the last 3,000 years. Before that time, historians generally agree that a system of bartering was likely used.
Money conveys the importance that people place on it. Money allows people to trade goods and services indirectly, communicate the price of goods, and it provides individuals with a way to store their wealth over the long-term. Before money, people acquired and exchanged goods through a system of bartering, which involves the direct trade ...
Money allows people to trade goods and services indirectly, it helps communicate the price of goods ( prices written in dollar and cents correspond to a numerical amount in your possession , i.e. in your pocket, purse, or wallet), and it provides individuals with a way to store their wealth in the long-term.
While most of the time, the terms "money" and "currency" are used interchangeably, there are several theories that suggest that these terms are not identical. According to some theories, money is inherently an intangible concept, while currency is the physical (tangible) manifestation of the intangible concept of money.
According to some theories, money is inherently an intangible concept, while currency is the physical (tangible) manifestation of the intangible concept of money. By extension, according to this theory, money cannot be touched or smelled. Currency is the coin, note, object, etc. that is presented in the form of money.
By extension, according to this theory, money cannot be touched or smelled. Currency is the coin, note, object, etc. that is presented in the form of money. The basic form of money is numbers; today, the basic form of currency is paper notes, coins, or plastic cards (e.g. credit or debit cards).
Before that time, historians generally agree that a system of bartering was likely used. Bartering is a direct trade of goods and services; for example, a farmer may exchange a bushel of wheat for a pair of shoes from a shoemaker. However, these arrangements take time.
But such wealth creation and preservation should be attempted in a measured manner, not by taking an inordinate degree of risk.
One of the most widely cited papers on the comparative wealth effect of the stock market versus the housing market was written by economic luminaries Karl Case, Robert Shiller (developers of the Case-Shiller home price indices), and John Quigley. Their paper, “Comparing Wealth Effects: The Stock Market versus the Housing Market,” was first presented in July 2001 and updated in 2005, when it attracted widespread attention due to the housing boom. 1 (The full original article is available here .)
The “wealth effect” is the premise that consumers tend to spend more when broadly-held assets like real estate and stocks are rising. The notion that the wealth effect spurs personal consumption makes sense intuitively. Anyone who owns a home or contributes to a 401 (k) plan might be inclined to splurge on a big-screen TV or an SUV ...
Regardless of whether it is caused by real estate or the stock market, the lesson from history is that investors should treat the wealth effect with caution, since spending unrealized gains that may be susceptible to reversals is seldom a good idea.
In a June 2009 working paper, three American economists, including Charles W. Calomiris of Columbia University, Stanley D. Longhofer, and William Miles of Wichita State University, argued that the wealth effect of housing has been overstated and that the reaction of consumption to housing wealth changes is probably very small.
Elvis Picardo is a regular contributor to Investopedia and has 25+ years of experience as a portfolio manager with diverse capital markets experience. Learn about our editorial policies. Elvis Picardo. Updated Oct 7, 2020. The “wealth effect” is the premise that consumers tend to spend more when broadly-held assets like real estate ...
After a certain level of income that can take care of basic needs and relieve strain ( some say $50,000 a year, some say $75,000 ), wealth makes hardly any difference to overall well-being and happiness and, if anything, only harms well-being: Extremely affluent people actually suffer from higher rates of depression.
Although wealth is certainly subjective, most of the current research measures wealth on scales of income, job status or measures of socioeconomic circumstances, like educational attainment and intergenerational wealth.
While money itself doesn't cause addiction or substance abuse, wealth has been linked with a higher susceptibility to addiction problems. A number of studies have found that affluent children are more vulnerable to substance abuse issues, potentially because of high pressure to achieve and isolation from parents.
The pursuit of wealth itself can also become a compulsive behavior. As Psychologist Dr. Tian Dayton explained, a compulsive need to acquire money is often considered part of a class of behaviors known as process addictions, or "behavioral addictions," which are distinct from substance abuse:
The term "affluenza" -- a portmanteau of affluence and influenza, defined as a "painful, contagious, socially transmitted condition of overload, debt, anxiety, and waste, resulting from the dogged pursuit of more" -- is often dismissed as a silly buzzword created to express our cultural disdain for consumerism.