how did the course of the war in the east differ from howthings were progressing in the west

Comparing how the courses of the war in the East differ from how things were progressing in the West is that the Eastern front happened to be more movable while the western front relied mostly on trench warfare.

Full Answer

Was the Western Front a two-front war?

The war on the Western Front is very much alive in the Western consciousness, but what is so often forgotten is that it was actually a two-front war in Europe. Germany was not only fighting in the West against the French and British (and eventually the Americans), but also in the East against the Russian Empire.

What was the difference between the Union and the Confederates?

The Confederates had a series of victories in the East, while in the West the Union was making gains List the leadership qualities displayed by the Confederate Generals Lee and Jackson that helped them win several battles in the East.

What happened on the Eastern Front in World War One?

The Eastern Front in World War One is often largely unknown to many Westerners. The situation there was quite different to that on the Western Front. Here, Rebecca Fachner follows up on her articles on Royal Family squabbles here and the spark that caused war to break out here.

Why were there no trenches in WW1?

Additionally, because the front line stretched over so large a territory, trench warfare, something that is so closely associated with the war in the west, was not a factor in the east. There was no need for trenches, as the armies had so much more room to maneuver.

What Battle was the turning point of the Civil War in the East?

The battle of GettysburgGettysburg. The battle of Gettysburg (July 1-3, 1863) is considered the turning point of the Civil War. Gen.

Did the East win the Civil War?

Fact #8: The North won the Civil War. After four years of conflict, the major Confederate armies surrendered to the United States in April of 1865 at Appomattox Court House and Bennett Place.

What were the war strategies of the North and South?

To summarize, the North had the Anaconda Plan to surround the South's territories, block the Atlantic Ocean, and take control of Mississippi. This would cut the stream of goods going into and out of the South to eventually force them to admit defeat.

How did Lee's plan in Maryland work?

On September 9, Lee issued Special Order 191 defining his “Maryland Campaign.” His plan to enter northern territory divided his army, sending each unit to march on a specific town: Boonsboro and Hagerstown in Maryland, and Harper's Ferry and Martinsburg in West Virginia.

Why was the Union successful in the West during the Civil War?

Why the Union was successful in the West during the Civil War? The Union took a defensive stance in the West. The Union had more troops than the Confederacy in the West. The Union was fighting in very familiar territory in the West.

Which victory in the West was most valuable to the Union why?

Which victory in the west was most valuable to the Union? The seize of Vicksburg, because it gave to the Union full control over the Mississippi River and split into two parts the Confederacy.

How was the war in the East different from the war in the West Civil War?

How did the course of the war in the East differ from how things were progressing in the West? In the West, the Union was winning more battles. And in the East, the confederates were winning more battles.

Why the North Won the Civil War?

Possible Contributors to the North's Victory: The North was more industrial and produced 94 percent of the USA's pig iron and 97 percent of its firearms. The North even had a richer, more varied agriculture than the South. The Union had a larger navy, blocking all efforts from the Confederacy to trade with Europe.

What advantages did the South have over the North in the Civil War?

The South could produce all the food it needed, though transporting it to soldiers and civilians was a major problem. The South also had a great nucleus of trained officers. Seven of the eight military colleges in the country were in the South. The South also proved to be very resourceful.

What were the strategies of the South?

Their strategy was to take advantage of their compact geography, with internal lines of communication, their military heritage (Southerners had been disproportionately the officers of the United States Army), and their greater enthusiasm for their cause to wear down the Union will to wage war.

What was the strategy of the South?

In American politics, the Southern strategy was a Republican Party electoral strategy to increase political support among white voters in the South by appealing to racism against African Americans.

What are the 3 reasons why Lee wanted to invade the North?

He had several objectives. An offensive would upset Union plans for a summer campaign, relieve a Virginia countryside exhausted by war, and allow the Army of Northern Virginia to live off the land in Pennsylvania.

What was the main most important reason that Lee chose Maryland for his invasion of the North?

If he remained in Virginia, Lee would be forced to react to Union movements, whereas in Maryland or Pennsylvania he would hold the initiative. Lee believed he could easily flank the enemy by crossing the Potomac upriver from Washington and marching the Army of Northern Virginia through Maryland.

Why did Robert E. Lee invade western Maryland?

By advancing into Maryland, Lee could relieve Virginia of enemy occupation. He knew the Union army would have to mirror his movements and take up defensive positions in front of Washington and Baltimore. Lee hoped that by marching into Maryland he could rally the Border State for the Southern cause.

What was the North's biggest advantage in the Civil War?

The North had geographic advantages, too. It had more farms than the South to provide food for troops. Its land contained most of the country's iron, coal, copper, and gold. The North controlled the seas, and its 21,000 miles of railroad track allowed troops and supplies to be transported wherever they were needed.

What are some of the main reasons that the North won the Civil War quizlet?

Although the population against slavery was less than those for slavery, the North had better economic, political, and social tactics. Economic: The north was well developed in the industry. They had more and better railroads and many other technological advancements that the south did not have.

Which two developments following the Civil War most helped open the American West?

The Federal government's response included The Homestead Act and the construction of the transcontinental railroad.

How long would slavery have lasted if the South won?

If the South Had Won the Civil War, Slavery Could Have Lasted Until the 20th Century. Aaron Sheehan-Dean is the Fred C. Frey Professor of Southern Studies at Louisiana State University.

What would have happened if the South won the Civil War?

A successful Confederacy would be a zero-sum economy. In the world of Confederate, the economy would be a hierarchy, with no social mobility, since mobility among economic classes would open the door to economic mobility across racial lines.

Did the South have a chance to win the Civil War?

It was one of the few instances in history involving an armed conflict between two democracies. And what so many people find startling is the fact that despite the North's enormous superiority in manpower and material, the South had a two-to-one chance of winning the contest.

Why did the South lose the Civil War?

The most convincing 'internal' factor behind southern defeat was the very institution that prompted secession: slavery. Enslaved people fled to join the Union army, depriving the South of labour and strengthening the North by more than 100,000 soldiers. Even so, slavery was not in itself the cause of defeat.

How did the Civil War end?

The war ended in Spring, 1865. Robert E. Lee surrendered the last major Confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865. The last battle was fought at Palmito Ranch, Texas, on May 13, 1865.

Which side started the Civil War?

ConfederateAt 4:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861, Confederate troops fired on Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Harbor. Less than 34 hours later, Union forces surrendered. Traditionally, this event has been used to mark the beginning of the Civil War.

Did the Civil War end slavery?

The Civil War was a brutal war that lasted from 1861 to 1865. It left the south economically devastated, and resulted in the criminalization of slavery in the United States. Confederate General Lee surrendered to Union General Grant in the spring of 1865 officially ending the war.

How did Russia start the war?

Russia began the war by invading eastern Germany. It was able to do so as Poland was not an independent country at this time meaning that Russia and Germany were contiguous. The first major engagement of the war was the Battle of Tannenberg, which was a resounding defeat for the Russians.

What was the Russian Empire's advantage in 1917?

As a fighting force, the Russian Empire was extremely contradictory. They were a formidable foe, but at the same time a very worrying ally. Their one huge advantage in warfare was the sheer numbers of troops that they had at their disposal.

Why did the Tsar move to army headquarters?

Eventually the Tsar, frustrated and exasperated, decided to move to army headquarters to take personal command of the military.

What was the Tsar's image problem?

Compounding the Tsar’s image problem was that he had left his wife in control in his absence. Empress Alexandra was dangerously unstable, and extremely unpopular, partly due to her association with the monk Rasputin; it was widely thought that she was under his direct control. Alexandra quickly assumed many of the governmental duties that her husband had left behind, which was very unfortunate, as she had little political acumen and no experience in government. What she did have was an unshakable faith in Rasputin, and a stubborn refusal to grasp how widely he was mistrusted and disliked. Alexandra careened from one disastrous policy to another, dismissing competent ministers and replacing them with self-serving yes men. Events continued to spiral out of control, and after years of war and shortages, poor management and an ineffective monarchy, it is actually extraordinary that the revolution didn’t happen sooner.

Did the war in the East slow down?

All told, it generally slowed down the war in the east. Additionally, because the front line stretched over so large a territory, trench warfare, something that is so closely associated with the war in the west, was not a factor in the east. There was no need for trenches, as the armies had so much more room to maneuver.

Was the war on the Western Front a two front war?

The war on the Western Front is very much alive in the Western consciousness, but what is so often forgotten is that it was actually a two-front war in Europe. Germany was not only fighting in the West against the French and British (and eventually the Americans), but also in the East against the Russian Empire.

Did the Russian Revolution end the war?

The Russian Revolution, at least the first one, didn’t end the war. The first Russian Revolution, in February 1917, deposed the Tsar but the Provisional Government that took his place did not want to end the war. Alexsandr Kerensky, the leader of the Provisional Government, had the makings of a political genius, and it is one of the frustrating what-ifs of the Russian Revolution to wonder what he might have achieved, but he was intent on continuing to prosecute the war. This proved to be the undoing of both the Provisional Government and Kerensky, as they underestimated just how war weary Russia was, and suffered the consequences when the Bolsheviks launched the October Revolution, promising, among other things, to end the war. The Bolsheviks sued for peace, and the Germans forced them to sign a humiliating treaty, ending the war in the east.