Explanation Affirming the consequent is a fallacious form of reasoning in which the converse of a true conditional statement (or “if-then” statement) is said to be true. In other words, it is assumed that if the proposition “if A, then B” is true, then “if B, then A” is true as well. Thus, its logical form is:
Affirming the consequent is an invalid argument because its premises do not guarantee the truthfulness of the conclusion. As seen above, there is a flaw in the argument’s structure because it uses erroneous conditional logic, and it is this flaw that renders the conclusion invalid.
Affirming the consequent is a formal fallacy (or deductive fallacy), which is a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument. Moreover, a deductive argument refers to one that is intended to provide a necessarily valid conclusion if the premises are true, and its validity is dependant on the structure of the argument.
A tobacco grower says, "I'm not the only one growing it. If I stop, someone else will be there." Assuming that the man was experiencing dissonance from the fact that he was making his living from a crop that is bad for people's health, he appears to be reducing this dissonance by
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Cognitive dissonance always A. produces discomfort. B. leads to a change in behavior. C. makes people produce new cognitions. D. leads to the rationalization trap., In general, the more _______ a decision between alternatives, the ______ post-decision dissonance. A. freer; less B. revocable; greater C. permanent; greater D ...
Study chap 6: cognitive dissonance flashcards from Li Zhao's class online, or in Brainscape's iPhone or Android app. Learn faster with spaced repetition.
This error in reasoning is a type of formal fallacy (or deductive fallacy), which refers to a flaw in the structure of a deductive argument. A deductive argument is one that is intended to provide a necessarily valid conclusion if the premises are true: its validity is dependant on the structure of the argument.
Author. Paul Elsher. Affirming the consequent is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone mistakenly infers that the opposite of a true “if-then” statement is true. It’s a formal fallacy, meaning that there is an error in the argument’s logical structure, rendering the conclusion invalid.
Chloe debated for a long time about whether to take a psychology or a sociology course, both of which looked interesting. She finally chose the psychology course. Now, because she is experiencing ________, she raves about the psychology course to her friends.
Social psychologists had African American students do carefully constructed self-affirming writing assignments regarding their good qualities outside of school. If this approach was to work for you with a group of students who were in danger of being academically dismissed, how would it affect them?
5. George thinks of himself as an honest person until his brother reminds him that he's been known to keep extra change given to him by a cashier and to stock his home office for a sideline business with supplies taken from his job. George is now probably feeling a sense of discomfort known as
Talia loves animals but still eats meat. When she experiences dissonance about the contradiction, she tells herself that she also volunteers her time at an animal shelter. This manner of reducing dissonance involves
Chloe debated for a long time about whether to take a psychology or a sociology course, both of which looked interesting. She finally chose the psychology course. Now, because she is experiencing ________, she raves about the psychology course to her friends.
Social psychologists had African American students do carefully constructed self-affirming writing assignments regarding their good qualities outside of school. If this approach was to work for you with a group of students who were in danger of being academically dismissed, how would it affect them?
5. George thinks of himself as an honest person until his brother reminds him that he's been known to keep extra change given to him by a cashier and to stock his home office for a sideline business with supplies taken from his job. George is now probably feeling a sense of discomfort known as
Talia loves animals but still eats meat. When she experiences dissonance about the contradiction, she tells herself that she also volunteers her time at an animal shelter. This manner of reducing dissonance involves