according to course material, the social class where marriages are described as "fragile" is the:

by Oleta Zboncak 6 min read

What is the relationship between marriage and family formation?

to determine the "social class background" of respondents, sociologists typically examine the income level, the occupational prestige, and the educational level of a person. ... (living together before marriage) will cause divorce rate to go down (presumably will know each other better before). In this hypothesis, _____ is the dependent ...

Does marital status determine social class?

1.alot of downward mobility, young adults don't leave home. -when people can't be independent they push off marriage. 2. overtime decline in stigma, cohabitation is on the rise, premarital sex is the norm, birth control is a norm, divorce not stigmatized. -leads to culture wars.

Is there a socioeconomic divide in family formation through marriage?

Divorce rates in America remain relatively high and family formation through marriage is declining. Traditionally, marriage and family formation went hand in hand. When married families are the norm of social organization, family dissolution, when it happens, is a natural and expected outcome. It is mostly driven by the attainment of adulthood ...

Are middle-class couples happier with their marriages?

b. The social class system is very simple because throughout society there is relative equality. c. Social class status is determined almost exclusively by the occupation that one has. d. The U.S. system is elaborate; it could be depicted by a ladder with a different social class at each rung.

How does social class affect marriage?

When it comes to coupling, poor and working-class Americans are more likely to substitute cohabitation for marriage. Figure 2 shows that poor Americans are almost three times more likely to cohabit, and working-class Americans are twice as likely to cohabit, compared with their middle- and upper-class peers age 18–55.Sep 25, 2017

How does socioeconomic status affect marriage?

At higher SES levels, couples postpone marriage and childbirth to invest in education and careers, but they eventually marry at high rates and have relatively low risk for divorce. At lower SES levels, couples are more likely to cohabit and give birth prior to marriage and less likely to marry at all.

Who is more likely to divorce rich or poor?

It's difficult to say which socioeconomic class divorces more often, but we can say married couples are more financially stable and that divorce (in general) leads to wealth reduction. It appears from the data we have that the most financially secure are people who get married and stay married.Jun 19, 2017

Is marriage a social structure?

Key Takeaways: Marriage Marriage serves important social functions, and social norms often determine the role each spouse takes in a marriage. Because marriage is a social construct, cultural norms and expectations determine what a marriage is and who can marry.Nov 1, 2019

How does social class affect relationships?

Your social class can influence both your interests and your values, which makes a difference in your relationships. Although social status is not the only influence on relationships, it does matter, and should be recognized so you can deal with it successfully.

Does social status matter in marriage?

According to Emery and Finkel, social class impacts your life in many other ways as well, including your happiness, your health, and even your intimate relationships. For instance, lower socio-economic status couples are less likely to get married and more likely to get divorced than higher-SES counterparts.Sep 10, 2021

Why do people marry?

to signify a life-long commitment. to provide security for children. to make a public commitment to each other. for legal status and financial security.May 18, 2015

Who files divorce more?

Whether accepted or not, there is one fact that cannot be disputed. And that is that women initiate divorce more often than men on average. Numerous studies have shown this. In fact, nearly 70 percent of divorces are initiated by women.

Who benefits more from divorce?

Generally: Men who provide less than 80% of a family's income before the divorce suffer the most. On the other hand, men who provided more than 80% of a family's income before a divorce do not suffer as much financial loss, and may even marginally improve their financial situation.

What is social marriage?

However, in a broad sense, in Indian Society a marriage (social marriage) is solemnized not only between two individuals but also between two families; although this is changing.

How do you describe marriage?

A commonly accepted and encompassing definition of marriage is the following: a formal union and social and legal contract between two individuals that unites their lives legally, economically, and emotionally.Aug 5, 2021

What is marriage in social studies?

marriage, a legally and socially sanctioned union, usually between a man and a woman, that is regulated by laws, rules, customs, beliefs, and attitudes that prescribe the rights and duties of the partners and accords status to their offspring (if any).Apr 11, 2022

What is poverty threshold?

The poverty threshold is based on: a thrifty food budget, and multiplied by three. With respect to the division of household labor: an increasing number of males and females believe household labor should be shared equally, but women still do 2 to 3 times the amount of labor.

When did dating start?

This pattern was referred to as: calling. The emergence of dating began in the 19th and early 20th century , and was related to several social changes.

Is romantic love true?

true. Romantic love is a type of love that grows over time, based on strong commitment, friendship, and trust. false. Among the Mangaia people of Polynesia, both girls and boys are expected to have a high level of sexual desire in early adolescence.

What is romantic love?

Romantic love is a type of love that grows over time, based on strong commitment, friendship, and trust.

Where does Liam live?

Liam lives in Western Europe, where the focus on family programs tends to be: universal. The Canadian health care system: costs about $5,000 per person on health care, compared to about $9,000 per person in the United States.

Do mothers work part time?

Most mothers DO work part-time. The amount of money that our Social Security system offers to working parents while they take care of their children is generally not enough to cover the bills.-----WRONG. Workplaces are flexible and often allow part-time work, but women will not take it.

What is double standard?

the double standard. Your membership in certain groups, such as your sex, race, or social class, shapes who you are, the values you hold, and the opportunities and constraints you experience, including with regard to sexuality. This implies: that sex is social.

What was the first decade of the new millennium?

The first decade of the new millennium (i.e., 2000-2009 ) has been one of uncertainty and instability. Economic growth has averaged slightly over 2% per year since 2000, compared to 3% per year during the previous two decades and 4% in the 1960s ( U. S. Department of Commerce, 2009 ). Following the mid-1990s, housing prices soared, increasing on average nearly 50% after two decades of stability. Since then, the twelve-month change in nominal house prices has turned negative nationwide for the first time since the Great Depression and mortgage loan foreclosures have soared ( OECD, 2008 ), underscoring the significant economic distress in the U.S. as the decade draws to a close. A number of trends further demonstrate these adverse changes in the economy.

What is the a priori assumption of social selection?

An a priori assumption of most research on SES, family functioning, and human development is that social position influences families across time, and that socioeconomic disadvantage has negative consequences for adults and children (e.g., Conger et al., 2002; Haas, 2006 ). This underlying tenet represents an instance of the social causation perspective which assumes that social conditions lead to variations in health and well-being. Other theoretical models assume that the relationship between SES and family processes is explained by individual differences in the personal characteristics of family members that affect both their SES and their family relationships. This view represents the social selection perspective which assumes that the traits and dispositions of individuals influence both their social circumstances and their future emotions and behaviors (e.g., McLeod & Kaiser, 2004 ).

What is the family stress model?

The FSM predicts that economic problems will lead to deterioration in marital relationships and increase risk for marital instability . Although the FSM’s focus is on economic conditions, we suspect it also captures much of the influence of limited educational or occupational achievement. For example, education is an important predictor of income across the life course ( Krieger et al., 1997) and there is a strong positive association between occupational prestige and income ( Treiman, 1976 ). Given these established relationships, it is reasonable to expect that much of the influence of educational or occupational status on marital functioning will be indirect through variations in economic well-being. Thus, we assume that findings related to the economic predictions from the FSM likely reflect educational and occupational differences in SES as well.

What is the IM in education?

The IM is primarily concerned with the advantages that accrue to the developing child because of family wealth and financial prosperity. The IM proposes that families with greater economic resources are able to make significant investments in the development of their children whereas more disadvantaged families must invest in more immediate family needs ( Bradley & Corwyn, 2002; Duncan & Magnuson, 2003; Linver et al., 2002; Mayer, 1997 ). These investments in children involve several dimensions of family support including (a) parent stimulation of learning both directly and through support of advanced or specialized tutoring or training, (b) the provision of adequate food, housing, clothing, and medical care, and (c) living in a more economically advantaged neighborhood that fosters a child’s competent development.

What is the most glaring methodological flaw in the research reviewed here?

The single most glaring methodological flaw in the research reviewed here involves the use of cross-sectional data to evaluate models proposing causal relationships among theoretical constructs. Although there has been significant replication of predictions from the FSM and IM using cross-sectional studies, this methodology can only lead to very weak inferences regarding hypothesized causal relationships. During the next decade it will be important to conduct tests of these models using data collected over time. In that way it will be possible, for example, to determine if changes in income lead to changes in the adjustment of parents and children and in the quality of their family relationships. This approach will also allow consideration of feedback loops such as the possibility that the emotional distress of parents will reduce their capacity to cope successfully with economic hardship, thus increasing family financial problems across time (see Conger & Conger, 2002 ). Indeed, the current downturn in the economy creates a natural experiment for examining how families are influenced by both increasing economic problems and, hopefully, the return of better economic fortunes. In addition to these types of passive longitudinal research designs, investigators should take advantage of changes in local economies that create opportunities for quasi-experiments of the type conducted by Costello and her colleagues (2003) when a new casino opened in a community. There should also be more attention paid to theoretically driven experimental interventions like the New Hope project (see Huston et al., 2005 ). Other methodological improvements relate to better measurement of family characteristics using multiple family informants and trained observers of family interactions (e.g., Lorenz, Melby, Conger, & Xu, 2007; Mikelson, 2008 ;). Also important will be additional studies that evaluate SES and family functioning for different ethnic, racial, and national groups.