Feb 21, 2022 · You’ll need to ask yourself two questions: 1. Assuming that the reasons/premises offered are true, would they actually demonstrate that the conclusion is true? (In other words, is there a direct connection between the reasons and the conclusions?) 2. How true are the reasons being offered to support the conclusion?
Jun 21, 2020 · Step-by-step explanation. a)To effectively evaluate a an argument there is need to make considerations on various factors, which includes: The credibility of the argument. The argument should be analysed and determined whether it is credible before a conclusion can be made to ensure that the right decisions are made following a perfect analysis ...
Feb 23, 2005 · Two examples illustrate the differences between a valid and a sound argument. All birds are mammals. (premise) A platypus is a bird. (premise) Therefore, the platypus is a mammal. (conclusion) This is a valid deductive argument, even though the premises are both false. But because those premises are not true, the argument is not sound.
Question 2 0 out of 2.5 points Which standard are you demonstrating when you ask yourself these questions: Do we need to consider another point of view? ... Please complete the deductive argument below: Premise 1: All humans are mortal Premise 2: I am human Conclusion: Therefore, I am _____ Question 1 options: ... Course Hero is not sponsored ...
If a deductive argument is valid, that means the reasoning process behind the inferences is correct and there are no fallacies. If the premises of such an argument are true, then it is impossible for the conclusion not to be true. Conversely, if an argument is invalid, then the reasoning process behind the inferences is not correct.
Premises Are Assumed True. In an argument, the premises offered are assumed to be true, and no effort is made to support them. But, just because they are assumed to be true, does not mean that they are. If you think they are (or may be) false, you can challenge them and ask for support.
Inductive arguments, on the other hand, are considered strong if the conclusion probably follows from the premises and weak if it follows only improbably from the premises, despite what is claimed about it. If the inductive argument is not only strong but also has all true premises, then it is called cogent. Weak inductive arguments are always ...
Strolling through the woods is usually fun. The sun is out, the temperature is cool, there is no rain in the forecast, the flowers are in bloom, and the birds are singing. Therefore, it should be fun to take a walk through the woods now. Assuming you care about those premises, then the argument is strong.
Therefore, the platypus is a mammal. (conclusion) This is a valid deductive argument, even though the premises are both false. But because those premises are not true, the argument is not sound. It is interesting to note that the conclusion is true, which shows that an argument with false premises can nevertheless produce a true conclusion.